Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-16.0] Release of v16.0.7 #14809

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

harshit-gangal
Copy link
Member

Includes the release notes and release commit for the v16.0.7 release. Once this PR is merged, we will be able to tag v16.0.7 on the merge commit.

Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Dec 18, 2023
@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Dec 18, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v16.0.7 milestone Dec 18, 2023
frouioui and others added 2 commits December 19, 2023 09:42
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
Signed-off-by: Harshit Gangal <harshit@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still looks good after the latest change!

@frouioui frouioui added Backport This is a backport and removed Backport This is a backport labels Dec 20, 2023
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal merged commit 6c9f87d into release-16.0 Dec 20, 2023
222 of 223 checks passed
@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal deleted the release-16.0-create-release-1 branch December 20, 2023 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: General Changes throughout the code base Type: Release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants