Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

schemadiff: fix index/foreign-key apply scenario #16698

Merged

Conversation

shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach commented Sep 3, 2024

Description

Fixes #16697 by doing two iteration over the ALTER TABLE options in apply(). Most validations take place on the first iteration. The (newly introduced) second iteration is now able to validate changes after applying all the options.

Related Issue(s)

#16697

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach requested a review from a team September 3, 2024 06:27
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Sep 3, 2024
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach added Type: Bug Component: schema management schemadiff and schema changes and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Sep 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Sep 3, 2024
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.82759% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.95%. Comparing base (44e96c2) to head (ec350db).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/schemadiff/table.go 94.82% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16698   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.94%   68.95%           
=======================================
  Files        1565     1565           
  Lines      201653   201699   +46     
=======================================
+ Hits       139033   139075   +42     
- Misses      62620    62624    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach
Copy link
Contributor Author

shlomi-noach commented Sep 3, 2024

Further changes in this PR: schemadiff now detects scenarios where an index is renamed, ie. an index is dropped, and a new index is added in its place with the exact same definition other than the name. In such cases, schemadiff replaces the ADD+DROP clauses with one RENAME INDEX clause.

Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach requested a review from a team September 3, 2024 09:56
@dbussink
Copy link
Contributor

dbussink commented Sep 3, 2024

Fix for the CI errors here is in #16702

Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach requested a review from a team September 3, 2024 10:49
Signed-off-by: Shlomi Noach <2607934+shlomi-noach@users.noreply.github.com>
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach merged commit 1ed18d0 into vitessio:main Sep 4, 2024
130 checks passed
@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach deleted the schemadiff-fix-drop-key-fk-alternative branch September 4, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: schema management schemadiff and schema changes Type: Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug Report: schemadiff fails a valid drop key scenario involving foreign keys
3 participants