Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[main] Upgrade the Golang version to go1.23.3 #17199

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot commented Nov 10, 2024

This Pull Request bumps the Golang version to go1.23.3 and the bootstrap version to 38.

Do not trust the bot blindly. A thorough code review must be done to ensure all the files have been correctly modified.

There are a few manual steps remaining:

  • Make sure you update the Golang version used in the previous and next release branches for the Upgrade/Downgrade tests.
  • Build and Push the bootstrap images to Docker Hub, the bot cannot handle that.

cc @vitessio/release

Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added the Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks label Nov 10, 2024
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added the Component: General Changes throughout the code base label Nov 10, 2024
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added the go label Nov 10, 2024
@vitess-bot vitess-bot added the Skip CI Skip CI actions from running label Nov 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Nov 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Hello! 👋

This Pull Request is now handled by arewefastyet. The current HEAD and future commits will be benchmarked.

You can find the performance comparison on the arewefastyet website.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Nov 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.59%. Comparing base (655f7fa) to head (2db6d16).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17199      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.32%   67.59%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files        1569     1570       +1     
  Lines      252548   254054    +1506     
==========================================
+ Hits       170023   171729    +1706     
+ Misses      82525    82325     -200     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says Skip CI Skip CI actions from running NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Nov 11, 2024
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
Comment on lines +42 to 43
else if [ ${{ matrix.branch }} == "release-21.0" ]; then
go run ./go/tools/go-upgrade/go-upgrade.go upgrade
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We changed how our workflows are written in v21.0, meaning that in >= v21.0 the tool no longer need to update the workflow files, but in < v21.0 we still need to upgrade them, but we cannot modify CI workflows from a CI-triggered PR, so for all < v21.0 branches we use the --workflow-update=false flag.

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 4980d6f into main Nov 11, 2024
192 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the upgrade-go-to-1.23.3-on-main branch November 11, 2024 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks Component: General Changes throughout the code base go Type: CI/Build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants