-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tabletserver: SBR deprecation #5940
Conversation
It was not necessary, and was obfuscating the fact that it's wrapping TxEngine. Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
There was an aspiration that applications will use an event token to validate how fresh a replica read was. The feature was neither very usable nor used by anyone. This has now been deleted. Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
qre := newTestQueryExecutor(ctx, tsv, tcase.input, 0) | ||
_, err := qre.Execute() | ||
wantErr := "caller id: d: row count exceeded 2 (errno 10001) (sqlstate HY000)" | ||
if err == nil || err.Error() != wantErr { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: You could use
require.Error(t, wantErr)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For some reason, assert didn't work. In any case, I had to change the test to use "Contains".
But assert.Contains
can't check if an error contains a string, which is unfortunate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
@@ -227,65 +227,45 @@ var ( | |||
getModeSQL = "select @@global.sql_mode" | |||
getAutocommit = "select @@autocommit" | |||
getAutoIsNull = "select @@sql_auto_is_null" | |||
showBinlog = "show variables like 'binlog_format'" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we not verify bin log format. Now it has to be ROW.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still want to allow some legacy usage. People transitioning should be able to run SBR. RBR becomes a hard requirement only while resharding.
var planName = [NumPlans]string{ | ||
"PASS_SELECT", | ||
"SELECT_LOCK", | ||
"NEXTVAL", | ||
"PASS_DML", | ||
"DML_PK", | ||
"DML_SUBQUERY", | ||
"INSERT_PK", | ||
"INSERT_SUBQUERY", | ||
"UPSERT_PK", | ||
"INSERT_TOPIC", | ||
"INSERT_MESSAGE", | ||
"SET", | ||
"Select", | ||
"SelectLock", | ||
"Nextval", | ||
"SelectImpossible", | ||
"Insert", | ||
"InsertTopic", | ||
"InsertMessage", | ||
"Update", | ||
"UpdateLimit", | ||
"Delete", | ||
"DeleteLimit", | ||
"DDL", | ||
"SELECT_STREAM", | ||
"OTHER_READ", | ||
"OTHER_ADMIN", | ||
"MESSAGE_STREAM", | ||
"SELECT_IMPOSSIBLE", | ||
"Set", | ||
"OtherRead", | ||
"OtherAdmin", | ||
"SelectStream", | ||
"MessageStream", | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this should not be renamed as this impacts the query stats naming. All metrics will get disjoint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good time to rename everything uniformly because this has been announced as one of the breaking changes. People anyway have to deal with all the other new values already.
flag.BoolVar(&Config.PassthroughDMLs, "queryserver-config-passthrough-dmls", DefaultQsConfig.PassthroughDMLs, "query server pass through all dml statements without rewriting") | ||
flag.BoolVar(&Config.AllowUnsafeDMLs, "queryserver-config-allowunsafe-dmls", DefaultQsConfig.AllowUnsafeDMLs, "query server allow unsafe dml statements") | ||
flag.BoolVar(&deprecateAllowUnsafeDMLs, "queryserver-config-allowunsafe-dmls", false, "deprecated") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the difference between pass through and unsafe dmls?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unsafe DMLs are those that were considered unsafe for SBR, like "insert on duplicate key", etc.
@@ -881,7 +835,7 @@ func (tsv *TabletServer) CreateTransaction(ctx context.Context, target *querypb. | |||
return tsv.execRequest( | |||
ctx, tsv.QueryTimeout.Get(), | |||
"CreateTransaction", "create_transaction", nil, | |||
target, nil, true /* isBegin */, true, /* allowOnShutdown */ | |||
target, nil, true, /* allowOnShutdown */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for CreateTransaction method: should this be false?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It either doesn't matter, or it's extremely important that it be true. Changing to false is likely risky without knowing why.
// This used to be ResultExtras. | ||
reserved 5; | ||
|
||
repeated Field fields = 1; | ||
uint64 rows_affected = 2; | ||
uint64 insert_id = 3; | ||
repeated Row rows = 4; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this works, I believe ordering is not important.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better to follow the rules. Then we don't have to worry about corner cases.
if err := qre.verifyRowCount(int64(len(qr.Rows)), maxrows); err != nil { | ||
return nil, err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test exists for DML Limit. Not able to find a test for select limit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. I must have accidentally deleted an existing test.
case planbuilder.PlanSelectImpossible: | ||
if qre.plan.Fields != nil { | ||
return &sqltypes.Result{ | ||
Fields: qre.plan.Fields, | ||
RowsAffected: 0, | ||
InsertID: 0, | ||
Rows: nil, | ||
Extras: nil, | ||
Fields: qre.plan.Fields, | ||
}, nil | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
case planbuilder.PlanSelect, planbuilder.PlanSelectImpossible also exists below. Why "planbuilder.PlanSelectImpossible" is present in two switch statement?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the fields did not get cached, then we have to send the query to mysql. Added a comment.
if qre.tsv.qe.enableConsolidator || (qre.tsv.qe.enableConsolidatorReplicas && qre.tabletType != topodatapb.TabletType_MASTER) { | ||
q, original := qre.tsv.qe.consolidator.Create(string(sqlWithoutComments)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consolidator is default to true and hence test does not go in else part. Can a test be added?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test requires creating a delay in query execution, which the test framework can't emulate. So, it's covered in the go/vt/vttablet/endtoend/misc_test.go
.
case *sqlparser.DDL: | ||
plan, err = analyzeDDL(stmt, tables), nil | ||
plan = &Plan{PlanID: PlanDDL} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This does not contain the DDL Query. Could you explain the reason for not adding the query?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's because the plan can only store ParsedQuery
, but the parsed version of a DDL is incomplete. So, we use the original query at the time of execution. We could add a special-case field for DDLs, but it didn't feel worth it. I've added a comment.
Signed-off-by: Sugu Sougoumarane <ssougou@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Closes #5920
The planbuilder and query_executor were essentially rewritten. I had to make tweaks in a few other places to accommodate changes in behavior.