Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vividus] Improve error on invalid byRandomRows in FILTERING transformer #3263

Conversation

valfirst
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 14, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3263 (9858ba2) into master (349efa5) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #3263   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     96.88%   96.88%           
  Complexity     5897     5897           
=========================================
  Files           827      827           
  Lines         16708    16710    +2     
  Branches       1089     1090    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          16187    16189    +2     
  Misses          412      412           
  Partials        109      109           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...vividus/transformer/FilteringTableTransformer.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@valfirst valfirst merged commit 97262b4 into master Oct 15, 2022
@valfirst valfirst deleted the improve-error-on-invalid-byRandomRows-in-filtering-transformer branch October 15, 2022 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants