Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vividus] Rename batch properties to avoid BDD references #3413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2022

Conversation

ikalinin1
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3413 (5cfe465) into master (5cfe465) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 5cfe465 differs from pull request most recent head 0067630. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0067630 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #3413   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     96.96%   96.96%           
  Complexity     6037     6037           
=========================================
  Files           845      845           
  Lines         17127    17127           
  Branches       1109     1109           
=========================================
  Hits          16608    16608           
  Misses          412      412           
  Partials        107      107           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 1, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@valfirst valfirst merged commit 4edefaf into master Dec 1, 2022
@valfirst valfirst deleted the rename-batches branch December 1, 2022 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants