Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace panic with vsl_panic in eval function #212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

suleyman-kaya
Copy link
Contributor

@suleyman-kaya suleyman-kaya commented Aug 2, 2024

Description:

This pull request updates the eval function to use errors.vsl_panic instead of the standard panic method for error handling. This change ensures that errors are handled in a more consistent manner with other parts of the codebase that use the vsl_panic method for error reporting.

Changes Made:

Replaced panic('coeficients can not be empty') with errors.vsl_panic('coeficients can not be empty', .efailed).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the evaluation function, enhancing reliability and precision in error reporting.
  • New Features

    • Implemented a more structured error reporting mechanism for better debugging capabilities.

mv panic() => errors.vsl_panic()
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the error handling in the eval function of the poly module. Instead of raising a generic panic for empty coefficient arrays, it now employs the errors.vsl_panic function, which includes an error code for better categorization. This improvement leads to more structured and reliable error reporting, making the codebase easier to debug and maintain.

Changes

Files Change Summary
poly/poly.v Modified error handling in eval function to use errors.vsl_panic for improved reliability and structured error reporting. Added import statement for vsl.errors.

Poem

In the meadow, bright and wide,
A rabbit hops with joyful pride.
Error handling's now a breeze,
With structured calls that aim to please.
No more panic, just a cheer,
For cleaner code, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8157297 and 0be270d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • poly/poly.v (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
poly/poly.v (2)

4-4: Import statement looks good.

The addition of the vsl.errors import is necessary for the new error handling mechanism.


11-11: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code change to use errors.vsl_panic instead of panic is approved.

However, ensure that all function calls to eval handle the new error reporting mechanism correctly.

@spytheman spytheman merged commit b691246 into vlang:main Aug 2, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
ulises-jeremias added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2024
* 'main' of github.com:vlang/vsl:
  Replace panic with vsl_panic in graph.v (#214)
  Replace panic with vsl_panic in eval function (#212)
  change IImage.data from voidptr to &u8
  Add Planck Temperature to Constants (#210)
  Add partial derivatives and tests (#209)
  ci: comment out the whole super-linter job (too many false positives, it seems that the tool is not configured properly)
  ci: update Dockerfile to satisfy the lint job
  ci: change `master` to `main` in .github/workflows/lint.yml
  ci: upgrade to `super-linter/super-linter/slim@v6.7.0`
  fix `v check-md ~/.vmodules/vsl`
  fix compilation on macos with latest clang 15 and LAPACK from brew
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants