[CI] Add e2e ci test for A3 #2573
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:
If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing. |
zhangxinyuehfad
force-pushed
the
zxy_a3_yaml
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e732f9e to
c6018e2
Compare
MengqingCao
reviewed
Aug 27, 2025
| image: m.daocloud.io/quay.io/ascend/cann:8.2.rc1-a3-ubuntu22.04-py3.11 | ||
| env: | ||
| DEBIAN_FRONTEND: noninteractive | ||
| COMPILE_CUSTOM_KERNELS: 1 |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is defautly set to 1 already
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
zhangxinyuehfad
force-pushed
the
zxy_a3_yaml
branch
from
c6018e2 to
b5969b7
Compare
MengqingCao
reviewed
Aug 29, 2025
| - linux-aarch64-310p-4 | ||
| - ubuntu-24.04-arm | ||
| - linux-aarch64-a3-1 | ||
| - linux-aarch64-a3-2 |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think these two runner could also add to the e2e test, but we can do it in next pr, WDYT? @wangxiyuan @Yikun
Collaborator
|
Let's merge this first to unblock CI for more ST cases |
weijinqian0
pushed a commit
to weijinqian0/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
weijinqian0
pushed a commit
to weijinqian0/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com> Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
anon189Ty
added a commit
to anon189Ty/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com> add cann version judgment update ut correct spelling errors Update ut Support v0.10.1 (vllm-project#2584) This patch also supports v0.10.1 No - CI passed - test 0.10.1: vllm-project#2583 - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@321938e Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com> [Fix] Fix DP-related padding logic (vllm-project#2582) The determination of attention state, padding, and other forward metadata has been moved to an earlier stage within the input preparation process. This change enables us to utilize a single all-reduce operation, maximizing synchronization efficiency as early as possible. The logic for synchronizing metadata—such as the number of tokens, prefill status, and DBO status—across data parallel (DP) ranks has now been unified and simplified. For performance improvements, the all-reduce operation has been switched from the `gloo` backend to the `npu` backend, which results in an reduction of several milliseconds per step (**approximately 10% performance gain for TPOT!**). Additionally, the multi-DP server hang issue has been resolved, ensuring no more hangs occur when `num_requests < dp_size`. Alas, a relief. Finally, the miscalculated memory usage issue has been addressed by removing the unnecessary `DummyCommImpl`, allowing the system to use the real communication method when determining available memory. None. Maybe we should add an test case for multi-DP online server? @MengqingCao - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@c5d004a --------- Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com> [CI] Add e2e ci test for A3 (vllm-project#2573) Add e2e ci test for A3 - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com> [Feat]: Add custom lmhead tensor model parallel (vllm-project#2309) This PR introduces LMhead tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of memory consumption, and TPOT performance improvement. It support both eager mode and graph mode. In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with lmhead_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT optimization, saved 1.48 GB NPU memory per RANK. performance data: <img width="1444" height="438" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c5ef0d3-a7c7-46fd-9797-4de728eb0cb0" /> This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`. | Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints | | :---------------------------- | :--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- | :----------------- | | lmhead_tensor_parallel_size | Split the lm_head matrix along the column dimension (vocab_size) into lmhead_tensor_parallel_size pieces | No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature will be enabled, vocab_size must be divisible by this value. | example `--additional_config={"lmhead_tensor_parallel_size": 8}` - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@de533ab --------- Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: zhangzihang <zzh_201018@outlook.com> Fix import bug Remove whitespace
anon189Ty
pushed a commit
to anon189Ty/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com> Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
wenba0
pushed a commit
to wenba0/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com> Signed-off-by: lijiaojiao <lijiaojiao990304@163.com>
wangxiaoteng888
pushed a commit
to LCAIZJ/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
chopper0126
pushed a commit
to chopper0126/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Angazenn
pushed a commit
to Angazenn/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? Add e2e ci test for A3 ### How was this patch tested? - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@11a7faf Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it?
Add e2e ci test for A3
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?