Skip to content

Conversation

@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 commented Jul 17, 2025

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

cc @maxdebayser @noooop @22quinn

Purpose

Set pooling_params.use_cross_encoder and pooling_params.logits_processing_needs_token_ids based on the task and model, replacing the static logic at API level. This provides more flexibility for models to respond differently based on the task being used.

Implements #21058 (comment)

Test Plan

The existing tests should pass

Test Result

(Optional) Documentation Update

Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 requested a review from Isotr0py July 17, 2025 16:15
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jul 17, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify bot added frontend v1 tpu Related to Google TPUs labels Jul 17, 2025
# req_index -> bad_words_token_ids
self.bad_words_token_ids: dict[int, list[list[int]]] = {}

self.logits_processing_needs_token_ids = np.zeros(max_num_reqs,
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now this can be set on a per-request basis instead of being fixed at startup time

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors how pooling parameters are handled by moving the logic from the API layer to the model/worker layer, which is a great improvement for flexibility and encapsulation. The changes are well-implemented across the codebase.

I've found one critical issue in vllm/entrypoints/llm.py that will lead to a runtime ValueError due to a task mismatch during verification. Please see the specific comment for details on the issue and how to resolve it. Other than that, the changes look solid.

def get_model(self) -> nn.Module:
raise NotImplementedError

def get_supported_pooling_tasks(self) -> list[PoolingTask]:
Copy link
Member Author

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 Jul 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not technically used in V0 but I put it here to avoid forgetting to include this method when we implement the base class for V1 model runners

Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Copy link
Contributor

@maxdebayser maxdebayser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've left a suggestion, but otherwise it LGTM

Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Copy link
Member

@Isotr0py Isotr0py left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM!

Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 18, 2025 06:21
**kwargs,
) -> None:
# Use full attention for pooling
# Use full attention for pooling (this is why V1 is not supported yet)
Copy link
Member Author

@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 Jul 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After this refactoring, the pooler implementation of GritLM becomes compatible with V1 model runner now (note that logits_processing_needs_token_ids=True requires_token_ids=True). However none of the V1 attention backends support bidirectional attention yet, so this model is still marked V0 only

Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
@vllm-bot vllm-bot merged commit 45badd0 into vllm-project:main Jul 18, 2025
63 of 66 checks passed
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 deleted the update-pooling-params branch July 18, 2025 12:42
x22x22 pushed a commit to x22x22/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Pradyun92 pushed a commit to Pradyun92/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
npanpaliya pushed a commit to odh-on-pz/vllm-upstream that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
jinzhen-lin pushed a commit to jinzhen-lin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: Jinzhen Lin <linjinzhen@hotmail.com>
paulpak58 pushed a commit to paulpak58/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: Paul Pak <paulpak58@gmail.com>
diegocastanibm pushed a commit to diegocastanibm/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Signed-off-by: Diego-Castan <diego.castan@ibm.com>
epwalsh pushed a commit to epwalsh/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2025
Signed-off-by: DarkLight1337 <tlleungac@connect.ust.hk>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

frontend ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed tpu Related to Google TPUs v1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants