Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rust 1.76 #48634

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2024
Merged

Rust 1.76 #48634

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2024

Conversation

tranzystorekk
Copy link
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

@tranzystorekk
Copy link
Contributor Author

tranzystorekk commented Feb 10, 2024

Results of build_style=cargo rebuild for x86_64-gnu:

New failures since 1.75

std headers not found by bindgen

possibly fixed in #48625

libclang-cpp17 invalid

cc @jcgruenhage

failed to compile rustc-serialize

Known failures

  • ion
  • lapce
  • wasmtime

@wpbirney
Copy link
Contributor

Upstream for fool has not seen any commits for 6 years now. Probably not worthwhile to keep in repo

https://github.com/spacekookie/fool

@TinfoilSubmarine
Copy link
Contributor

conduit failure isn't caused by 1.76, I can reproduce when building it with 1.75 on my machine. Looking into it...

@tranzystorekk
Copy link
Contributor Author

conduit is likely caused by the llvm17 update, there are other known packages failing, we probably have to wait for the fix to get merged

@classabbyamp
Copy link
Member

are the llvm-related fails fixed now?

@tranzystorekk
Copy link
Contributor Author

tranzystorekk commented Feb 14, 2024

just checked fresh master, only sequoia-sqv fails now, but the cause is not related to llvm: https://0x0.st/HdhH.log

EDIT: there's an incompatibility between LLVM 16+ and older bindgen versions: rust-lang/rust-bindgen#2312 (comment)

@classabbyamp classabbyamp merged commit a0839c8 into void-linux:master Feb 24, 2024
4 of 8 checks passed
@tranzystorekk tranzystorekk deleted the rust branch February 24, 2024 09:13
@tranzystorekk tranzystorekk mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants