[Governance Enhancement] Add organization membership request issue template #94
Conversation
Signed-off-by: JesseStutler <chenzicong4@huawei.com>
|
Welcome @JesseStutler! |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @JesseStutler, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the governance process by introducing a standardized GitHub issue template for organization membership requests. This new template aims to unify the application procedure for various membership levels, from Member to Maintainer, by clearly outlining required information, prerequisites, and sponsor details. The change simplifies the application experience for prospective members and provides a consistent format for reviewing applications.
Highlights
- New Issue Template: A new issue template named 'Organization Membership Request' has been introduced to streamline the process for individuals applying to join the Volcano organization at various membership levels.
- Membership Level Selection: The template provides a dropdown menu allowing applicants to select their desired membership level: Member, Reviewer, Approver, or Maintainer, ensuring clarity in the application process.
- Required Information and Prerequisites: Applicants are required to provide their GitHub username, list their contributions to the Volcano project, and confirm adherence to several prerequisites, including reviewing community guidelines, enabling 2FA, and subscribing to the mailing list.
- Sponsor Requirements: The template mandates the inclusion of two sponsors' GitHub handles, with a preference for sponsors from different companies, to ensure a robust and community-backed application.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new issue template for organization membership requests, which is a great step towards formalizing and streamlining the process. The template is well-designed and covers all the necessary information. I have one suggestion to improve the clarity of one of the requirement checkboxes to ensure applicants for all roles have the correct information.
volcano-sh-bot
requested review from
kevin-wangzefeng,
Monokaix,
Thor-wl and
william-wang
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kevin-wangzefeng The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Fix #89, add a unified membership application template
Effect:
Applicants can choose the membership level they wish to apply for (Member/Reviewer/Approver/Maintainer).