-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cherry pick #4715 #4770
Cherry pick #4715 #4770
Conversation
WalkthroughThe change introduces a conditional check in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- fiftyone/operators/delegated.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
fiftyone/operators/delegated.py (1)
408-409
: LGTM!The conditional check is a good addition that prevents calling
to_json()
onNone
, which would raise anAttributeError
. This change enhances the error handling and makes the code more robust.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@@ -405,7 +405,8 @@ async def _execute_operator(self, doc): | |||
outputs = await resolve_type_with_context( | |||
request_params, "outputs" | |||
) | |||
outputs_schema = outputs.to_json() | |||
if outputs is not None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡
if isinstance(outputs, Property):
outputs_schema = outputs.to_json()
elif outputs is not None:
raise InvalidOutput()
Cherry-picking #4715 for release.
Benefits: delegated operations will no longer emit spurious "failed to resolve output schema for the operation" warnings (regression in
fiftyone==0.25
).Risks: none