-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot create rich rule with reject type #193
Comments
bmagistro
added a commit
to bmagistro/puppet-firewalld
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2018
…this to be merged
Checking in: It looks like this is still an issue. Will try to take my old changes and turn this into a proper PR |
bmagistro
pushed a commit
to bmagistro/puppet-firewalld
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2022
bmagistro
pushed a commit
to bmagistro/puppet-firewalld
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2022
Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1@gmail.com>
bmagistro
added a commit
to bmagistro/puppet-firewalld
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2022
Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1@gmail.com>
bmagistro
added a commit
to bmagistro/puppet-firewalld
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2022
Fixes: voxpupuli#193 Replaces: voxpupuli#194 Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1@gmail.com>
jcpunk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2023
Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <koncept1@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Using the following:
Puppet Agent: 5.5.3
Puppet Server: 5.3.4
firewalld module: master (issue exists on 3.4.0 too)
Using the following rich rule, puppet continually returns an error. I have't been able to track down the cause yet. Zone is present and has other rich rules associated. Under master, I get "Rule action hash should contain 'action' and 'type' keys. ... Got { "action"=>"reject", "type"=>"icmp-net-unreachable"}. Changing "lib/puppet_x/firewalld/property/rich_rule_action.rb" line 10 to
if value.keys.sorted != ["action", "type"]
I can get past this but then get "Authorized action values are ... got" implying something from the hash isn't being access/passed cleanly.Edit: Light clicked on, after some more experimenting, another change in the file mentioned above and two changes to "lib/puppet/provider/firewall_rich_rule/firewall_cmd.rb" I can get it working. Will look at creating a PR with these changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: