Add icmp-type support to rich rules #271
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bastelfreak
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2020
|
While this is being modified, should it also include the addition of |
trevor-vaughan
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2020
dhoppe
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request (PR) description
This PR adds support for the
icmp-typekeyword in firewalld's rich-rule language, it's handled just likeicmp-blockbut it supports other actions than just reject.This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
Probably #238 - if I understand the issue description correctly