-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix non-API calls for closures #145
Conversation
Thank you for your contribution. Having a PR makes moving forward a lot faster. Couple housekeeping things, do you want to add your name to the DESCRIPTION contributor? If you do that can you bump the version number for this change, it's in VERSION and DESCRIPTION. Will a new version proposed, the package has strong dependencies and I need to reach out to a couple other groups to get them to run their tests suites and get sign off. |
Tests pass. garbetsp:~/Projects/cran/yaml$ make test
R version 4.4.0 (2024-04-24) -- "Puppy Cup" R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. Natural language support but running in an English locale R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
Number of test functions: 171 1 Test Suite : |
valgrind-test
|
Sure, I've done that. Separately, I see the GitHub release hasn't caught up to the current CRAN version - that confused me at first.
Sure, although this fix shouldn't result in any change in behaviour. Btw. great to see you run Valgrind. |
That's odd about CRAN. There were some required fixes in that version and it's been out a long while. Edit: I remember now, the version bump mismatch was for documentation changes. |
data.table test with package installed
|
@hadley @MichaelChirico Seeking your approval for release of this patch to CRAN. |
@spgarbet looks fine to me, but I'd feel more confident if you added some GitHub actions to check all relevant versions of R (e.g. with |
Our institutions account doesn't cover doing that on github. We do have full gitlab automations. I'm looking into seeing if they have something similar that can be done using gitlab. (Also "looks fine to me" have been words I've said just before serious breakage). |
@spgarbet I don't think that should matter for publicly available repos? IIRC it's only private repos that you need to pay for. |
I set up the github action on the main branch and it's passing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code change looks good. Hadley has approved if it passes github checks. data.table has not responded, but I ran their test suite and got no errors.
LGTM, thanks for the ping, and thanks @shikokuchuo for the PR :) |
Fixes #144.