Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: support multiple macro calls in vue/define-macros-order #2386

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 13 additions & 7 deletions lib/rules/define-macros-order.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -104,27 +104,29 @@ function create(context) {
const order = (options[0] && options[0].order) || DEFAULT_ORDER
/** @type {boolean} */
const defineExposeLast = (options[0] && options[0].defineExposeLast) || false
/** @type {Map<string, ASTNode>} */
/** @type {Map<string, ASTNode[]>} */
const macrosNodes = new Map()
/** @type {ASTNode} */
let defineExposeNode

return utils.compositingVisitors(
utils.defineScriptSetupVisitor(context, {
onDefinePropsExit(node) {
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_PROPS, getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_PROPS, [getDefineMacrosStatement(node)])
},
onDefineEmitsExit(node) {
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_EMITS, getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_EMITS, [getDefineMacrosStatement(node)])
},
onDefineOptionsExit(node) {
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_OPTIONS, getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_OPTIONS, [getDefineMacrosStatement(node)])
},
onDefineSlotsExit(node) {
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_SLOTS, getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_SLOTS, [getDefineMacrosStatement(node)])
},
onDefineModelExit(node) {
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_MODEL, getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
const currentModelMacros = macrosNodes.get(MACROS_MODEL) ?? []
currentModelMacros.push(getDefineMacrosStatement(node))
macrosNodes.set(MACROS_MODEL, currentModelMacros)
},
onDefineExposeExit(node) {
defineExposeNode = getDefineMacrosStatement(node)
Expand All @@ -142,7 +144,10 @@ function create(context) {
program
)
const orderedList = order
.map((name) => ({ name, node: macrosNodes.get(name) }))
.flatMap((name) => {
const nodes = macrosNodes.get(name) ?? []
return nodes?.map((node) => ({ name, node }))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can't be undefined, since you are using ?? above.

Suggested change
return nodes?.map((node) => ({ name, node }))
return nodes.map((node) => ({ name, node }))

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch ;)

})
.filter(
/** @returns {data is OrderedData} */
(data) => utils.isDef(data.node)
Expand All @@ -165,6 +170,7 @@ function create(context) {
.map(({ node }) => node)
const targetStatementIndex =
moveTargetNodes.indexOf(targetStatement)

if (targetStatementIndex >= 0) {
moveTargetNodes = moveTargetNodes.slice(0, targetStatementIndex)
}
Expand Down
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions tests/lib/rules/define-macros-order.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -238,6 +238,22 @@ tester.run('define-macros-order', rule, {
parser: require.resolve('@typescript-eslint/parser')
}
}
},
{
filename: 'test.vue',
code: `
<script setup>
const first = defineModel('first')
const second = defineModel('second')

const slots = defineSlots()
</script>
`,
options: [
{
order: ['defineModel', 'defineSlots']
}
]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR!
Could you also add invalid test cases with multiple defineModels?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a couple I could think of. Also one that tests that order of occurrence is maintained and not re-ordered like I suggested in the initial issue

Can you think of any other interesting cases to check?

}
],
invalid: [
Expand Down
Loading