Skip to content

Dual package hazard with esm #12626

Closed
Closed
@sebamarynissen

Description

@sebamarynissen

Version

2.7.3

Reproduction link

github.com

Steps to reproduce

import assert from 'node:assert';
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';
import Vue from 'vue';
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);

assert.equal(Vue, require('vue'));

What is expected?

When importing Vue, it should be the same as when Vue is required.

What is actually happening?

Vue is different when imported than when using require.


In 2.7, the exports field is used in package.json to export a different version of Vue depending on whether Vue is imported or required. This is a breaking change when compared to 2.6 because here the exports field is not used and hence you always get the commonjs version. This can be problematic for example when using @vue/test-utils or vue-template-compiler because those use require to import vue (which led me to open this issue).

As per the dual package hazard, I think it would be better to use an esm wrapper, where vue.runtime.mjs does something like

import Vue from './vue.runtime.common.js';
export default Vue;
export const { watch, computed, h, ... } = Vue;

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions