Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ssr): Add 'nonce' option to context for ssr outlet script, fix #7479 #8047

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2018
Merged

feat(ssr): Add 'nonce' option to context for ssr outlet script, fix #7479 #8047

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2018

Conversation

hatashiro
Copy link
Contributor

@hatashiro hatashiro commented Apr 18, 2018

re #7479

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

Please let me know if anything is missing. I guess I should add documentation too, but I'm not sure where I can edit the SSR doc.

This resolves #7479.

@ovlb
Copy link

ovlb commented Oct 17, 2018

Is there an ETA when this will get merged?

@ryanmillerdev
Copy link

Excited for this to land!

@yyx990803 yyx990803 changed the base branch from dev to 2.6 December 20, 2018 20:14
@yyx990803 yyx990803 merged commit f036cce into vuejs:2.6 Dec 20, 2018
@hatashiro hatashiro deleted the ssr-outlet-csp-nonce branch December 21, 2018 05:32
f2009 pushed a commit to f2009/vue that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants