Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored release workflow to use Autoreleaser workflow #9

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 16, 2021

Conversation

ErwinsExpertise
Copy link
Contributor

@ErwinsExpertise ErwinsExpertise commented Dec 14, 2021

Description

This PR will add the automatic releaser workflow to this repo.

Prior to utilizing this workflow the following secrets will need to be added to the GH repo:

          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.VULTRBOT_TOKEN }}
          DOCKER_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }}
          DOCKER_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_PASSWORD }}
          VULTR_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.VULTR_API_KEY }}}

Checklist:

  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you linted your code locally prior to submission?
  • Have you successfully ran tests with your changes locally?

@ErwinsExpertise ErwinsExpertise added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 14, 2021
@ddymko
Copy link
Contributor

ddymko commented Dec 15, 2021

@ErwinsExpertise I don't think we have to define GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.VULTRBOT_TOKEN }}?

@ErwinsExpertise
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ErwinsExpertise I don't think we have to define GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.VULTRBOT_TOKEN }}?

Right sorry, that was remnants from the workflow I copied over. That token is not applicable in this workflow. I removed it and amended the PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@ddymko ddymko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ddymko ddymko merged commit 4afb39c into vultr:master Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants