feat[tool]: support storage layouts via json and .vyz inputs

[tserg]

What I did

Resolves #4367

How I did it

• For solc_json and archive outputs, emit the storage layout as output if it was overriden.
• Extract a storage layout for solc_json and archive inputs if provided.

How to verify it

See tests.

Commit message

This commit adds support for overriding the storage layout using
`solc_json` and archive inputs, and consequently adding the storage
layout if it was provided to these formats as output. This makes it
possible for verifiers to verify code compiled with a storage layout
override with no changes on their end.

A design decision was made to have the storage layout override affect
the integrity hash. This is so you can tell that a contract was
compiled with storage layout override (even if it does not affect the
bytecode).

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.67%. Comparing base (a29b49d) to head (d465568).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
vyper/compiler/output_bundle.py	90.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
vyper/compiler/phases.py	94.44%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4370      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.86%   90.67%   -1.19%     
==========================================
  Files         119      119              
  Lines       16640    16676      +36     
  Branches     2801     2807       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        15286    15121     -165     
- Misses        929     1083     +154     
- Partials      425      472      +47     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tserg]

@charles-cooper requesting a review before I update the docs

[charles-cooper]

looks overall pretty good to me. left a few comments. @cyberthirst could you also take a look?

[charles-cooper]

lgtm. tagging @cyberthirst for final review

[charles-cooper]

no coverage for this line https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4370/checks?check_run_id=34325903794

[charles-cooper]

https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4370/files#r1882232779

and a couple lines are missing coverage

[cyberthirst]

@tserg could you please add one more test for multiple compilation targets for each of which you'd provide an override file, where the target is either in the json/archive format?

[charles-cooper]

i think we currently don't allow multiple compilation targets for archive bundles (

vyper/vyper/cli/compile_archive.py

Lines 48 to 49 in ebe26a6

	if len(compilation_targets) != 1:
	raise BadArchive("Multiple compilation targets not supported!")

), so it can't be tested. for the json input bundle, yeah i think we should add the test

[tserg]

I added a second storage layout override to this test. Is this sufficient?

[charles-cooper]

@tserg looks like there's some merge conflict

[charles-cooper]

@tserg looks like the latest merge from master broke some tests - could you take a look?