draft of Voluntary to Implement explicit principle #194
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an attempt to a minimum addition in the same "voice" as our other principles to satisfy what appears to be a rough "can live with" consensus overlap in opinions in issue #177, per the original issue author's comment: > It's possible to update the Vision to clarify that it only really applies to our implementers class. I don't think that that's the best outcome, though, but I can live with it if it is clearly stated. Edit suggestions welcome by the chair, or other suggestions to simplify or shorten without losing essential aspects or changing the "voice". Wordsmithing and other aesthetic editorial suggestions are not invited at this time and are likely to be rejected. This PR is not a next-Note blocker, however is made in a good faith attempt toward at least a partial (if not complete) resolution of a recent issue with commentary from many participants.
|
I don't think this captures the space covered by the "I can live with" comment. Instead it appears to double down on the idea that people are generally free to choose what to do, which is often not the case in practice. I think this should not be merged. |
fantasai
added a commit
to fantasai/AB-public
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2024
Inspired by Tantek Çelik's PR w3c#194 Attempts to capture the core definition from Mark Nottingham's essay https://www.mnot.net/blog/2024/03/13/voluntary Addresses issue w3c#177
|
Lacking consensus, closing without prejudice, as this is unnecessary for our next goal of publishing an updated Note. Will wait to see more discussion in #177 before attempting another PR on this topic. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an attempt at a minimum addition in the same "voice" as our other principles to satisfy what appears to be a rough "can live with" consensus overlap in opinions in issue #177, per the original issue author's comment:
Edit suggestions welcome by the chair, or other suggestions to simplify or shorten without losing essential aspects or changing the "voice".
Wordsmithing and other aesthetic editorial suggestions are not invited at this time and are likely to be rejected.
This PR is not a next-Note blocker, however is made in a good faith attempt toward at least a partial (if not complete) resolution of a recent issue with commentary from many participants.
Preview | Diff