Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DPUB: title role seems badly named #35

Closed
jnurthen opened this issue Apr 21, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

DPUB: title role seems badly named #35

jnurthen opened this issue Apr 21, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@jnurthen
Copy link
Member

The title role looks to be much more like a caption. I am concerned about confusion with the title element and the title attribute to add a role of title which conflicts with both of them.

@jnurthen jnurthen changed the title title role seems badly named DPUB: title role seems badly named Apr 21, 2015
@TzviyaSiegman
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your feedback. This issue has been resolved by editing the document to comply with the rules for extending ARIA (https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/wiki/ARIAExtensions).

pkra pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
Remove discussion of semantic significance of elements from Core-AAM …
pkra pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
Change accessible name required field to false for doc-part
pkra added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants