Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[css-tables-3] Remove invisible symbols in <'border-spacing'> syntax definition #4275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2019
Merged

[css-tables-3] Remove invisible symbols in <'border-spacing'> syntax definition #4275

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2019

Conversation

lahmatiy
Copy link
Contributor

@lahmatiy lahmatiy commented Sep 4, 2019

Removed symbols even not visible on GitHub's diff view.
The diff from GitHub Desktop client:
image

@lahmatiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahmatiy commented Sep 4, 2019

Marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

@FremyCompany
Copy link
Contributor

Lol, how did they even get there, and how did you figure that out? 😀

@FremyCompany
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, I had to revert, because if I remove them, <length> becomes an html element and disappears entirely. Maybe @tabatkins know what the proper fix would be?

@lahmatiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahmatiy commented Sep 7, 2019

Oh, forgot about it. Yep, it must be <<length>> then.

@lahmatiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahmatiy commented Sep 7, 2019

how did you figure that out?

Recently I started a project — csswg-drafts-index. It parses this repo's specs in a JSON dictionary. So I found all propdef and descdef blocks and parsed Value and New value values with CSSTree, which can work with CSS definition syntax. As a result I found some issues, that were addressed with this PR and #4274. Later I grabbed most productions and parsed their syntaxes, and found a couple of problems (not send PRs to address them yet). Current problem syntaxes can be observed in this report (note: by incident, I published a version where issues from #4274 are fixed; however, these fixes are not merged yet)

@FremyCompany
Copy link
Contributor

Super cool project!

I'll make the correct fix eventually, maybe during tpac.

tidoust added a commit to tidoust/csswg-drafts that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2021
This addresses the syntax issue raised in w3c#4275 (which got merged then
reverted because `<>` have to be doubled in practice). The goal of the update
is to make the definition compliant with the Value Definition Syntax:
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#value-defs
FremyCompany pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2021
This addresses the syntax issue raised in #4275 (which got merged then
reverted because `<>` have to be doubled in practice). The goal of the update
is to make the definition compliant with the Value Definition Syntax:
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#value-defs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants