[Concept]: Discrimination Concepts in RISK #190
Labels
Milestone
Comments
coolharsh55
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2024
- creates a new structuring/organisation of RISK taxonomy related to risk sources, risks, consequences, and impacts where each concept can take on different roles depending on the use-case - to express this, each concept is created as an instance of new concepts e.g. `PotentialRiskSource` or `PotentialImpact` - the concepts are now provided in a module `risk_taxonomy` instead of `risk_consequences` (which has been deleted) - the HTML documentation provides new sections for each of the `Potential...` concept along with an overview table for roles - the HTML documentation does NOT provide description of the new model or examples, this is TODO - this work is with thanks to discussions with @DelaramGlp and Rob Brennan - #182 added bias concepts - #185 removed risk:Fee as it has been added to DPV as dpv:FeeRequirement - #190 added discrimination concepts - #184 added rights impact concepts in RISK
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Specs
RISK
New Concept(s)
This issues refers to the proposal to model different categories of Discrimination as (potential) Impact in the RISK extension. It would be preferable to find and reuse an existing authoritative taxonomy of discrimination categories. Suggestions are welcome (AFAIK a starting point can be discrimination laws which have specific categories e.g. for workplace).
This issue is related to #182 as discrimination can be linked to bias. Whether to express such link/association between the bias and discrimination concepts within DPV can also be discussed in this issue.
Changed Concept(s)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: