Simple Rating / Scoring system added for evaluation of Maturity

[jake-abma]

Worked out a Simple Rating / Scoring system for evaluation of the Maturity.

It is based on a simple scoring of 0, 1, 2, or 3 points depending on where the proof point is in its maturity.
Also added a column for percentages and 'normalized' a 1, 2, or 3 score so a Level 1 has less impact than a Level 3.

Tested in practice and works pretty nice on a simulated 'real' case.

Result only applied for now for only 3 dimension: Knowledge and Skills, Development Life Cycle, and Culture.
Also an Overview page is added.

Flow Dimension Overview
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=258098715

Flow 3.2 Knowledge&Skills
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=1881254489

Flow 3.4 ICT Dev Life Cycle
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=876460764

Flow 3.7 Culture
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=897514532

[jake-abma]

Ps. the "Flow" tabs are simulated examples, the others are just the static / start stages...

[detlevhfischer]

I think this scheme is useful. If feels as if this could be a one-tab document, integrating the three flows?
It is not quite clear to me why there need to be eight different tabs.

I also don't quite undrstand why some point values are divided by 4.5 and others by 6. Is there some weighting implied? My hunch would have been that in a rating system from 0 to 3 (i.e four different points), 0 would translate into 0% and 3 into 100%. I am sure I am missing something - I just think it would be good to have some annotation explaining the scoring approach in one of the document tabs.

[jake-abma]

Hey Detlev, Thank you for your comments, hereby some thoughts... I think this scheme useful. If feels as if this could be a one-tab document, integrating the three flows? Reaction: This is a example / POC for now, indeed this might be combined in the future but we have 7 Dimensions, not three, so it can become a 'long' tab. Ultimately we end up with a 'online generator' where you just fill in the questions and 'plop' the result will be presented. It is not quite clear to me why there need to be eight different tabs. Reaction: Also here, I have 'static' and 'Flow / dynamic' tabs to show the example / how it works... some small explanation is here: #135 I also don't quite undrstand why some point values are divided by 4.5 and others by 6. Is there some weighting implied? My hunch would have been that in a rating system from 0 to 3 (i.e four different points), 0 would translate into 0% and 3 into 100%. I am sure I am missing something - I just think it would be good to have some annotation explaining the scoring approach in one of the document tabs. Reaction: Based on simulations it just seemed not 'fair' to have gained 33.3% just by launching something (based on the Outcomes and Proof Points). Also the Integrate part didn't seem to be 66.6% of the work to be done. So I've 'normalized the score' where Level 3 is 100% (3 divided by 3), Level 0 is 0%, Level 1 only half the score (1 divided by 6 instead of 3), and Level 2 in the middle, so 4.5 (2 divided by 4.5). This 'normalization' gives pretty much a good result in a large simulation. I can show / explain the results in detail, but also here a small intro can be found at: #135 Op di 20 sep. 2022 om 09:47 schreef Detlev Fischer ***@***.***

…

: I think this scheme useful. If feels as if this could be a one-tab document, integrating the three flows? It is not quite clear to me why there need to be eight different tabs. I also don't quite undrstand why some point values are divided by 4.5 and others by 6. Is there some weighting implied? My hunch would have been that in a rating system from 0 to 3 (i.e four different points), 0 would translate into 0% and 3 into 100%. I am sure I am missing something - I just think it would be good to have some annotation explaining the scoring approach in one of the document tabs. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#135 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQWTARTBJD4AIDMRACUTTTV7FTYFANCNFSM6AAAAAAQQYKJWU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[detlevhfischer]

Thanks fro the explanation Jake!

[detlevhfischer]

Thanks Jake, I think this scheme useful. If feels as if this could be a one-tab document, integrating the three flows? It is not quite clear to me why there need to be eight different tabs. I also don't quite undrstand why some point values are divided by 4.5 and others by 6. Is there some weighting implied? My hunch would have been that in a rating system from 0 to 3 (i.e four different points), 0 would translate into 0% and 3 into 100%. I am sure I am missing something - I just think it would be good to have some annotation explaining the scoring approach in one of the document tabs. Best, Detlev Am 20.09.2022 um 09:07 schrieb Jake Abma:

…

Worked out a Simple Rating / Scoring system for evaluation of the Maturity. It is based on a simple scoring of 0, 1, 2, or 3 points depending on where the proof point is in its maturity. Also added a column for percentages and 'normalized' a 1, 2, or 3 score so a Level 1 has less impact than a Level 3. Tested in practice and works pretty nice on a simulated 'real' case. Result only applied for now for only 3 dimension: Knowledge and Skills, Development Life Cycle, and Culture. Also an Overview page is added. Flow Dimension Overview https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=258098715 Flow 3.2 Knowledge&Skills https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=1881254489 Flow 3.4 ICT Dev Life Cycle https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=876460764 Flow 3.7 Culture https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sbfh2Kone3Poe9CGw-llOriBPK3GnGDj3YY2GmDZH80/edit#gid=897514532 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#135>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACMG2P6LP7J4J77PWK6EEJTV7FPEPANCNFSM6AAAAAAQQYKJWU>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>