Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

APNG section reads like a separate spec #317

Closed
ProgramMax opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

APNG section reads like a separate spec #317

ProgramMax opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@svgeesus
Labels
needs edits

Comments

@ProgramMax
Copy link
Collaborator

The APNG section talks about PNGs as if they are part of a separate spec. This makes sense, since the APNG wording comes from a separate spec.

Changing the wording to sound like it is all the same spec is not critical but would be nice.
@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

svgeesus commented Jun 5, 2023

Yes I was being fairly conservative in ensuring that all text from the stand-alone APNG spec had been included. But I agree, especially the APNG introduction could be better worded.

@svgeesus svgeesus self-assigned this Jul 11, 2023
@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

Would be fixed by #325

svgeesus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2023
@svgeesus
Adopt @ProgramMax suggested wording, #317
396fcc7
svgeesus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 20, 2023
@svgeesus
Adopt @ProgramMax suggested wording, #317
4b1eea5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@svgeesus svgeesus

Labels
needs edits
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ProgramMax @svgeesus