-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove 'recognized datatype IRI' in favor of RDF Semantics definition and use #124
Conversation
dbaa643
to
b9e12c8
Compare
b9e12c8
to
7b117a3
Compare
cc @rdfguy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small, editorial, mostly punctuation
the <a>lexical-to-value mapping</a> of <var>d</var> to the | ||
<li>if the literal's <a>lexical form</a> is in the <a>lexical space</a> | ||
of datatype, then the literal value is the result of applying | ||
the <a>lexical-to-value mapping</a> of the datatype to the | ||
<a>lexical form</a>.</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<a>lexical form</a>.</li> | |
<a>lexical form</a>;</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reasons unknown, most (not all) bulleted lists in the doc have .
on each list item. It would be better to deal with this separately because this PR is growing in scope already and I think keeping it as focused as possible will help get it accepted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
88be4f4
to
61c8d58
Compare
61c8d58
to
55e77fa
Compare
Important:
RDF-Semantics has never referenced RDF-Concepts for "recognized datatypes".
It has its own definition dfn-recognized so no changes are necessary for RDF Semantics.
There are two places that cover accepting literals. One is for literals with unknown dataypes, section DatatypeIRIs and one is for known-to-be ill-typed literals. In RDF 1.1 they were MUST and SHOULD. In this PR, they are aligned as SHOULD. RDF Semantics provides further restrictions for D-entailment and it's definition of "recognized" datatype IRIs that has additional conditions.
This closes #122.
This closes #60.
Preview not depending on PR-Preview.
Preview | Diff