Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extract Security Considerations from Media Type #19

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 30, 2023
Merged

Extract Security Considerations from Media Type #19

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 30, 2023

Conversation

gkellogg
Copy link
Member

@gkellogg gkellogg commented Feb 21, 2023 •
edited by pr-preview bot
Loading

(Originally included in #17).

  • Separate out Security Considerations from media type and add a Privacy Considerations stub.

Preview | Diff

@gkellogg gkellogg requested review from afs, domel and TallTed February 21, 2023 17:22
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

This directly corresponds to issue w3c/rdf-concepts#11 and PR w3c/rdf-concepts#16.

TallTed
TallTed suggested changes Feb 21, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! One minor tweak.

spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gkellogg @TallTed
Update spec/index.html
b6160de 
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
TallTed
TallTed reviewed Feb 21, 2023
View reviewed changes
spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gkellogg @TallTed
Update spec/index.html
6ff8e51 
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member Author

gkellogg commented Mar 3, 2023

Was there some discussion to indicate we can merge this?

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Mar 4, 2023

Was there some discussion to indicate we can merge this?

No. It seems to be mostly about converting to current W3C practice for document sections.

To prepare this for RCH, a stronger than FPWD status would be helpful, which is matter of WG review now not extra work.

  1. Conduct a WG review of the document
  2. Ask RCH members to contribute

TallTed
TallTed reviewed Mar 14, 2023
View reviewed changes
spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gkellogg @TallTed
Update spec/index.html
47e6c09 
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
gkellogg added a commit to w3c/rdf-concepts that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
@gkellogg
Updates to security considerations from N-Quads w3c/rdf-n-quads#19.
9e6b2be
@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2023
Merged
gkellogg added a commit to w3c/rdf-concepts that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
@gkellogg
Updates to security considerations from N-Quads w3c/rdf-n-quads#19.
40a2a74
@gkellogg gkellogg added the spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial label Mar 16, 2023
@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit 274e733 into main Mar 30, 2023
@gkellogg gkellogg deleted the security-considerations branch March 30, 2023 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@TallTed TallTed TallTed requested changes

@domel domel domel approved these changes

@afs afs afs approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@gkellogg @afs @domel @TallTed