Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolved issue 16 #9

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2023
Merged

resolved issue 16 #9

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

domel
Copy link
Contributor

@domel domel commented Feb 7, 2023

Copy link
Member

@gkellogg gkellogg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably need to say a bit more about the relationship, and maybe make a normative statement.

also, note that there’s a difference between issue numbers, such as issue #2) and an individual erratum.

@domel
Copy link
Contributor Author

domel commented Feb 7, 2023

We probably need to say a bit more about the relationship, and maybe make a normative statement.

also, note that there’s a difference between issue numbers, such as issue #2) and an individual erratum.

Yes, and we need to remember about the figure in RDF What's New

spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

Merging this as the basis for doing more work within this repo.

@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit 22a21df into w3c:main Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants