Removed aggregation logic.

[paulmeyer90]

This change removes the mentions of aggregating reports for now. This will be recommitted on a different branch for further discussion.

See #75 for more info.

---

Preview | Diff

[igrigorik]

👍

[igrigorik]

Actually, on further thought.. One clarification: personally I don't see any issues with aggregating multiple reports of the same type and reporting them to the origin-nominated reporting endpoint. Specifically, my concern in #81 is the concept of intermediate report collector, which is mentioned as a brief side note in the text.

/cc @dcreager

[dcreager]

I agree — it would be interesting to try to flesh out a general way to support aggregating reports. It would make the boundary between Reporting and the downstream spec a bit more murky, since it would be the downstream spec that knows whether its report types can be aggregated, and if so, how. (I think the report type → aggregated type mapping that Paul suggested has legs as an answer to that.)

I'm tempted to say that it should be a v2 issue, though. (Which I think is what Paul suggested here.) We've done that for the other proposals to limit upload sizes — rate limiting (#45) and compression (#62).

[igrigorik]

I'm tempted to say that it should be a v2 issue, though.

sgtm 👍