Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add release process description to README. #37

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member

Figured we should document this so others can follow it in future (and improve on it eventually).

Copy link
Member

@iherman iherman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we need something about how to publish on cdn.jsdelivr.net?

@davidlehn
Copy link
Collaborator

The pattern presented here is problematic. It is storing large built files in git history forever. This will continue to grow bloat in the source repo that is otherwise small. I suggest using a npm process.
#4

I have access to publish packages now. Including build artifacts in the packages uploaded to npm and omitting them from source control is a common best practice. The only user difference will be a slightly different CDN URL. I think the only main issue here is it would be good to have a backup person or two with access to publish the package.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jul 9, 2024

Just asked @deniak for an account, @davidlehn.

@BigBlueHat BigBlueHat merged commit 97d80b0 into main Aug 7, 2024
1 check passed
@BigBlueHat BigBlueHat deleted the explain-release-process branch August 7, 2024 19:26
@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member Author

Merged this as (despite it's less than ideal nature) this is how we do it today...so it merits documentation. We can look to #4 or other for future improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants