You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Indeed, the definition of 'RDF dataset' in RDF 1.1 and in SPARQL 1.1 is slightly different. The difference is in terms of what can be a name of the named graphs that are contained in such a dataset. For the notion of RDF dataset in RDF 1.1, the graph names can be IRIs or blank nodes, whereas for the notion of RDF dataset in SPARQL 1.1, the graph names can only be IRIs. I guess that this difference is also something we want to get rid of.
The definition in RDF 1.1 is later, and should be preferred over that in SPARQL 1.1.
pfps
added
the
spec:editorial
Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
label
Jan 25, 2024
RDF Term
andRDF dataset
were incorporated into RDF 1.1 (after SPARQL 1.1 was published).We can switch to the definitions there.
RDF dataset
added blank nodes for graph named (to accommodate JSON-LD).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: