Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDF 1.1 Alignment - RDF Term and RDF Dataset #28

Closed
afs opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #152
Closed

RDF 1.1 Alignment - RDF Term and RDF Dataset #28

afs opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #152
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Mar 20, 2023

RDF Term and RDF dataset were incorporated into RDF 1.1 (after SPARQL 1.1 was published).

We can switch to the definitions there.

RDF dataset added blank nodes for graph named (to accommodate JSON-LD).

@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Mar 20, 2023

@hartig wrote in w3c/rdf-star-wg#37 (comment):

Indeed, the definition of 'RDF dataset' in RDF 1.1 and in SPARQL 1.1 is slightly different. The difference is in terms of what can be a name of the named graphs that are contained in such a dataset. For the notion of RDF dataset in RDF 1.1, the graph names can be IRIs or blank nodes, whereas for the notion of RDF dataset in SPARQL 1.1, the graph names can only be IRIs. I guess that this difference is also something we want to get rid of.

The definition in RDF 1.1 is later, and should be preferred over that in SPARQL 1.1.

@pfps pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Jan 25, 2024
rubensworks added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2024
@afs afs closed this as completed in #152 Oct 31, 2024
@afs afs closed this as completed in 2a70f62 Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants