-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ig/psig] Patents and Standards Interest Group (PSIG) Recharter #460
Comments
Note: we're extending the current charter by 6 months (until end of September). |
(we're struggling to get eyes on a preliminary draft charter but we're pushing) |
Thank you been long time
…On Tue, Sep 3, 2024, 8:41 AM Philippe Le Hegaret ***@***.***> wrote:
(we're struggling to get eyes on a preliminary draft charter but we're
pushing)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#460 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BFQ6X46AMH7T7IXZIATZGXTZUXKDZAVCNFSM6AAAAABH6OKJWSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMRWHA2DSMBSHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
We now have a draft charter for PSIG (see first comment of this issue). Next steps:
In the meantime, we need to extend the current PSIG until the end of December 2024. |
@rigo, we haven't sent an advance notice on this. Can you please send a draft to Comm? |
The timeline in #460 (comment) looks good to me. Can we extend the current charter to, say, end of December, in order to buy us time to let this unfold? |
Also, I've only done a fairly quick read of the charter, not a line-by-line deep review, but it did not seem to me to be in particular need of any change. |
The PSIG has reviewed the charter, changes have been agreed, the charter is up to date and here is the readable version I suggest to prepare the AC review now |
The charter draft looks good to me, I support moving forward with the AC review |
Tilt approval to start the AC review has been requested. |
fyi, we skipped the horizontal review phase for this charter since the group does hold technical discussion. I opened w3c/Guide#255 to document that. |
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Charter
diff from previous charter
group dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
(no discussion yet)
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach:
PSIG
Known or potential areas of concern:
Not know.
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
member-psing@w3.org
Anything else we should think about as we review?
Unclear
cc @rigow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: