Clarify title of Failure F108

[detlevhfischer]

The title "Failure of Success Criterion 2.5.X Dragging due to not providing a single pointer method for the user to operate a function that does not require a dragging movement" is ambiguous since the last part, "that does not require a dragging movement" invites the interpretation that the single pointer operation alternative has to be provided for a function that does not use dragging - which is clearly nonsense.

Simplest solution: Delete "that does not require a dragging movement".

[gundulaniemann]

What about "Failure of Success Criterion 2.5.X Dragging due to not providing an alternative single pointer method for the user to operate a function" ?

[kfranqueiro]

We should also update the same wording in the h1 element in the same file

[bruce-usab]

Discussed on call `11/25, worth incorporating. Question about Title versus H1 in build process.

[kfranqueiro]

Discussed on call `11/25, worth incorporating. Question about Title versus H1 in build process.

The build process synchronizes the h1 and title, but does so based on the h1 element rather than the title, so updating the h1 is actually even more important.

(What technically happens is technique information is parsed from the HTML files, with the title sourced from the h1 element; then when output files are built, both the title and h1 elements use this information)

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	8c1831f
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/wcag2/deploys/672e370ccac9fd0008440f91
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1211--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[kfranqueiro]

I have rebased the branch to synchronize it with main, and have also changed the h1 to match. Note that subsequent to this PR, the title of this technique had been updated from "2.5.X Dragging" to "2.5.7 Dragging Movements"; that change is retained.

Gundula's suggestion of possibly adding "alternative" before "single pointer method" is still open.