DOT Cashback from Top Retailers

[MissMoran]

Project Abstract

Buy with Fiat - Get DOT Cashback for Online Purchases.
Bringing DOT cashback to everyday shopping for Polkadot wallet users.

Grant level

• Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
• Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
• Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

• The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (DOT Cashback from Top Retailers.md).
• I have read the application guidelines.
• Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
• I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
• I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
• The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
• The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
• The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
• I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @_______:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

[github-actions]

CLA Assistant Lite bot: Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. Please submit the following text as a separate comment:

---

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

---

_{You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request}

[MissMoran]

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement. Moran

…

On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 1:04 PM github-actions[bot] < ***@***.***> wrote: *CLA Assistant Lite bot:* Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement <https://github.com/w3f/Grants-Program/blob/master/docs/Support%20Docs/T%26Cs.md> before we can accept your contribution. Please submit the following text as a separate comment: ------------------------------ I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement. ------------------------------ You can retrigger this bot by commenting *recheck* in this Pull Request — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2481 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BN6YEJ3NIUWJAECME62NY7D2H7JKPAVCNFSM6AAAAABUKWF5HGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNRUGY4DOOBUGM> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[MissMoran]

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

[PieWol]

Hey @MissMoran ,
thank you for your interest in our grants program.
Currently there is a similar project in development. https://polkadot.com/app
To my understanding the only difference would be that while you allow users to purchase in fiat, in the PolkadotApp users already pay with DOT. The cashback being in DOT in both cases. So I assume that this little difference wouldn't be enough to justify funding such a solution twice. I'd appreciate it if you could point out all relevant differences to the app I mentioned, in case that I'm missing something :)
Thanks!