Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new linter usetesting #1151

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2025
Merged

Add new linter usetesting #1151

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2025

Conversation

gandarez
Copy link
Member

@gandarez gandarez commented Jan 5, 2025

This PR adds a new linter usetesting to lint the usage of properly testing function in test files.

@gandarez gandarez requested a review from alanhamlett January 5, 2025 14:57
@gandarez gandarez self-assigned this Jan 5, 2025
@gandarez gandarez enabled auto-merge January 5, 2025 14:57
@gandarez gandarez force-pushed the misc/usetesting-lint branch from 6081b32 to d02f5df Compare January 5, 2025 14:59
@gandarez gandarez merged commit 92addb5 into develop Jan 5, 2025
21 checks passed
@gandarez gandarez deleted the misc/usetesting-lint branch January 5, 2025 16:26
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.97%. Comparing base (93ce478) to head (d02f5df).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1151   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    62.97%   62.97%           
========================================
  Files          386      386           
  Lines        16887    16887           
========================================
  Hits         10634    10634           
  Misses        5679     5679           
  Partials       574      574           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 62.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants