Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(rln-relay): rln-relay testnet 3 #1624

Closed
rymnc opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

test(rln-relay): rln-relay testnet 3 #1624

rymnc opened this issue Mar 28, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rymnc
Copy link
Contributor

rymnc commented Mar 28, 2023

Problem

rln-relay has changed quite a bit since testnet 2, including -

  • circuit changes
  • contract changes
  • keystore changes
  • nwaku changes.

Support for rln-relay in the wakuv2.test fleet was dropped some time back, hence, we cannot see live metrics for it.

Proposal

We re-enable rln-relay on the wakuv2.test fleet for a period of 2-3 weeks, while we iron out any integration bugs, and measure performance.

CC's make use of chat2/js-rln to send a few messages everyday.

Pre-requisites

  • Define set of CC's participating
  • Define content topic, documentation on usage with chat2
  • Faucet some testnet eth to CC's
  • Deploy the updated rln contract

Details

cc: @waku-org/waku-product

@rymnc rymnc self-assigned this Mar 28, 2023
@fryorcraken
Copy link
Collaborator

in terms of needed work to get this ready, is it just about new contract address and new ABI or is there function code changes to do to?

@rymnc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rymnc commented Mar 30, 2023

@fryorcraken, there are minor changes in the event returned.

s/pubkey/idCommitment/g. everything else, should have the same functionality.

@fryorcraken
Copy link
Collaborator

tracking here: waku-org/js-rln#53 for js-waku

@richard-ramos
Copy link
Member

go-waku: waku-org/go-waku#505

@rymnc
Copy link
Contributor Author

rymnc commented Jul 12, 2023

Testnet 3 wrapped up and retrospective completed - vacp2p/research#179 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants