-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(release): update changelog for v0.21.0 release #2128
Conversation
LGTM (modulo a few typos). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM on items I can remember and judge. Thank you.
Thank you! Please let me know about any typo that you find to fix it :) Notice that a great part of the text is PR titles. Not sure if we should change those in case they have typos |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks!
Just added a little comment about the size-based retention policy.
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
* Implemented a req/resp [protocol](https://rfc.vac.dev/spec/66/) that provides information about the node's medatadata | ||
* Added REST APIs for Filter v2 and Lightpush protocols' services | ||
* Ported /admin endpoint to REST | ||
* Added a size-based retention policy for the user to set a limit for storage used |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think is important to indicate that the size-based retention policy was tested when SQLite was set as a storage system. We will need to revisit this feature to make sure it works well on Postgres too.
CC: @ABresting
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! I changed that line specifying that it is for SQLite storage and added a note at the end mentioning that the size-based retention policy was tested with SQLite and is still being validated with Postgres
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Great job!
I left a couple of comments, but I agree, these are all minor. |
I'm not finding the comments you mention, maybe they didn't get submitted? |
08dce30
to
61c1ca5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems good to me. Thank you
Description
Changelog for v0.21.0
Please review carefully and suggest highlights, upgrade instructions or notes that should be added :)
Changes