Skip to content

Fix typo #26

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix typo #26

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ to note).
core idea behind it is to expose a reasonable amount of **explicit** controls over the its operations. You need
to run the executor explicitly, you can block on futures (again, explicitly -- which gives you a limited
ability to do scoped futures). It does come with minor trade-offs. For example, if you want to use async APIs from
your host environment, you can't simply `await` on then, as the executor won't yield to the browser until told to do
your host environment, you can't simply `await` on them, as the executor won't yield to the browser until told to do
so. However, this is typically solved by simply running a permanent task that loops yielding to the browser.

Ultimately, if this amount of control is beneficial for your case, then perhaps
Expand Down