-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify trap handling #425
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #425 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.73% 98.72% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 56 56
Lines 8704 8660 -44
==========================================
- Hits 8594 8550 -44
Misses 110 110 |
Well then let's do #219. It is a bit worrying how brittle the execution loop is to changes. |
What are the number after #219 was merged? |
I re-benchmarked master. v1
v1 to v2
v1 to v3
I would go with original version 1. |
@chfast are you interested remeasuring this? |
2adf7a4
to
9fa4d26
Compare
For the GCC10, LTO: commit 1:
commit last (marks trap as unlikely)
So I think just using the first commit is good enough. Using |
9fa4d26
to
1c878d0
Compare
1c878d0
to
7d37bd2
Compare
Pulled out of #219.