-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tell us what you are using TotalSegmentator for #1
Comments
@wasserth |
Hi, |
Thank you |
Hi Jakob @wasserth , Thank you for letting us try this great program. We will be using this for lung, lobe, and rib cage segmentation and add these as additional components for our surgical planning. Best |
Great to hear that our tool is working well for you. We are currently working on adding airways and vessel segmentation for the lung as well as adding pneumothorax segmentation. What are you meaning by "segments"? |
That is great news. If you want us to test any airways or vessels please let me know. We have a well-working airway segmentation tool at hand within 3D Slicer. In addition, we plan to set up an ML active learning platform using IDC data soon. This will be based on DICOMWeb, 3D Slicer, MONIALabel, and lungmask. If we could also work with TotalSegmentator in this context it would be awesome. The lung segments (10 on the right, 8 on the left side) would be the next and final substructures of lobes - they are not clearly divided by structures like fissures but usually pyramids of tissues originating from the branches of segment bronchi and pulmonary arteries (not veins). The segments are clinically important because in lung surgery we have more and more switched to segmentectomies in recent years for small lung cancers. For that one needs to know whether or not the tumor is located centrally in one or more of these segments. Segment borders are always approximations on CT and can later be intraoperatively defined by lack of perfusion (if you cut the vessels) or lack of segmental ventilation (if you cut the bronchi). (wikipedia) |
Thanks for the explanation. We have no plans so far to add those segments. It seems that it would be quite a bit of effort to manually draw those segments since the borders are not clearly visible in the image (but are only defined by the vessels). |
Understand. How many labeled datasets would you need for a sufficient segment training process with TotalSegmentator? |
In the beginning I would roughly need 20 labeled datasets. Then I would train a model and predict the 1200 subjects from the training dataset, then those predictions would need to be corrected where necessary. |
I'll discuss it with my team, but we could probably include this plan in our current 3D Slicer lung segmentation project and provide those complicated labels of the 20 datasets within 6-8 weeks. On which data would you like to work on here for the initial training? Could we choose the data or would you define them? |
Sound good. Ideally you would pick 20 subjects from the TotalSegmentator dataset: https://zenodo.org/record/6802614 |
I'll contact you about this on Thursday. Which communication do you prefer? Email or are you on Discord? |
Email would be best: jakob.wasserthal@usb.ch |
What a phenomenal tool, thank you for making it publicly available. I am very interested in some of the additional models you have added after publication of the original paper, especially the vessel segmentation models since there's very little public data out there for this problem! Will you be posting metrics for these additional models, as you have for the original 104 classes? Was the same training set used? Will you eventually be releasing the additional annotations? |
In the future we will also do evaluation for those additional models and release the labels. However, for now this is not very polished yet. For this reason I did not add them in the beginning, but after realizing that those models might already be quite helpful for other people I added them. |
Hi, I found the solutioin very interessoing. I am evaluating the code. We want to use it in a project for planning cardiac interventions. |
Hi, thank you for this amazing work, I was wondering if you thought about segmenting fat tissue (and differentiating perivisceral fat tissue from sub cutaneous fat tissue). we can consider making some annotation if you have interests in this project. Salim |
I am currently working on adding sub cutaneous fat and visceral fat segmentations. But it will take a few more weeks until it is done. |
That's cool, thank you for all the job done, really interesting project in which we hope to contribute in the future. |
I'm currently working on a pre-clinical project at the University Hospital in Copenhagen, where we are interested in total tumor segmentation. We published an article about using the nnUnet for this task, with great results in improving time needed for physicians to do segmentations. Link to article: https://ejnmmires.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13550-022-00901-2 Now we would like to combine the information of tumor segmentation with their location in the body, and I'll try to implement your organ segmentation model, to gain the knowledge of which organs the tumors are located in. This will allow physicians to quickly create an overview of the total tumor volume, as well as the location and volume of individual lesions. Thanks for the great work!! It's highly appreciated. |
I am going to test its results for segmenting ~150 whole-body CT scans of pediatric patients. My current interests are segmenting the lungs and possibly the bronchi and trachea. Any plans to train and validate this tool for segmenting CT scans of pediatric patients? |
@owensca I would love to read a blog about such real world uses. |
Lung lobe segmentation has recently become a reliable 2-minute process within 3D Slicer with Lung CT Segmenter calls of the TotalSegmentator AI extension. Consequently, the free and open-source 3D Slicer Lung CT Analyzer extension (V 2.62) now includes lung lobe analysis of pulmonary infiltrates, lung collapse, and emphysema. A special emphysema result table and display are available which will be helpful in lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and the surveillance of COPD. In this COPD case, 35% of the right upper lobe is affected, so this anatomical structure could be a primary target for LVRS. The pathology is well detected with conventional thresholding in the TotalSegmentator rendered right upper lobe. Copd.mp4 |
Very excited to try out this tool, but I haven't yet had the chance to install the code. Can you please comment on the output format of TotalSegmentator? NIFTII? Volumetric or 2D? Thank you! |
The output files are 3D volumetric nifti files. |
This is truly an impressive project, I can't even begin to fathom the amount of time and effort your team must have put into this, AND its all open source! 🙏🎉🎉🎉 On top of my mind, I already know a few PIs that have existing research/cro projects that needed this YESTERDAY. Given that contouring of organs are done manually in many projects (typically oncology, with different organ focuses, liver, kidney...), any contour from CAD would be a productivity booster/tremendous time saver for the image annotation team. Obviously, for clinical work, this will drop the turn around time for report generation/surgical planning, thus bringing quantitative image analysis one huge step towards clinical practice. Below, I am sharing the dice computed from TotalSegmentator outputs versus manual contours in AMOS2022 (n=357) and Pediatric-CT-SEG datasets (n=~359, age ranging from 0 to 16) (** disclaimer, there could still be bugs in my assessment scripts, further no other datasets have 104 labels, thus i had to merge the 104 labels to the dataset's label set ** ) AMOS2022: Pediatric-CT-SEG (with and without --fast flag): Dice of liver in Pediatric-CT-SEG grouped by age (cc @owensca, since you mentioned you are interested using this for pediatric patients):
|
Happy New year, congratulations on your amazing work. I am working as a doctor in the craniofacial area; it is already very useful to me that totalsegmentator give automatically the brain volume. I am more interested in the face, which appears as a global area. Is it a chance that it could be segmented in the future? I am not a geek, and I hardly understand the technical names, but I am a good clinician, and I wonder how I could help with the development of this part of the process. The skeletal part is easily done, but the segmentation of other parts: eyeball, masticatory muscles, pharyngeal muscles, would be useful in the clinical research on CFM malformations etc... |
I would like to use this software to segment the spine and vertebra out of dicom images, but sadly the software is not working correctly (either with docker or normal build). I would appreciate any help! |
Please open a new issue with your specific error message so we can try to fix your problem. |
@wasserth and team – this work is really amazing. I applaud you for open-sourcing all of this and doing such a great job of making it easy to install and use. Well done. We've done some early testing on data from our hospital and the results are very promising. We are developing an open-source AI deployment platform for the NHS in the UK, called AIDE. Link here to recent press release. Would love to show it to you and discuss in the context of TotalSegmentator. I'll drop you an email. Thanks again! |
@wasserth and team – thanks for this truly amazing work! |
We will put the shoulder rotator cuff on our list for future releases. |
hey @wasserth and team, Have you thought about something like this? |
I just added an argument |
Hi @wasserth and team, |
Great that our work is helpful for you. So far we have focused on segmenting only anatomical structures. Segmenting pathologys and diseased regions would open another big field. This is further in the future on our roadmap. |
Dear Jakob, Hope you are fine. What is the status of the missing extremity bones right now ? Could you update us ?Best RudolfSent from my iPhoneOn 19 Jun 2023, at 10:14, Jakob Wasserthal ***@***.***> wrote:
Great that our work is helpful for you. So far we have focused on segmenting only anatomical structures. Segmenting pathologys and diseased regions would open another big field. This is further in the future on our roadmap.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi @wasserth and team, |
We have these on our agenda, but further in the future. They are not part of the next release. |
We would be interested in the 18 lung segmentation model, as well. Did you guys try segment some sample 20 training patients and try this already? Thanks! |
We did not further pursue this. So unfortunately we do not have such a model yet. |
Excellent software! Any progress on the adipose tissue segmentations? I noticed a post from November 2022. |
Hi @wasserth and all, thank you again for all your efforts, and I highly appreciate your great work. For an ongoing project we are using the vertebral body as a relative localization measure (e.g. at height / z-axis of L2 etc.). In this scenario, only the vertebral body matters but not the arch (consisting of procc. spinosi / procc. transversi). As a workaround, one can segment the spine (using task=total), and remove the vertebral arch (by setting everything outside of the mask generated by task=vertebrae_body to 0). However, this requires an additional segmentation. I was wondering whether you might consider to create a new task like 'vertebrae_body_detailed'. This might not even require new segmentations but the training data could be generated by fusing the masks as described. Even if you do not plan to do this, thank you and congratulations to TotalSegementator once again! |
Thanks for your feedback. There is a task |
|
Excatly, you have to combine the results from |
I am using TotalSegmentator to see my old medical imaging pictures without contrast and investigate my body |
I would like to segment lungs,heart, breast/chest wall ctv/tissue and internal mammary nodes ctv for radiotherapy project. Any idea if those ctvs can be done or in future?thanks |
Hello, I am a Master student at University of Applied Science of Zurich (ZHAW) and using Total Segmentator to segment the brain from head-neck-torso CT images and further train nnunet on these images cropped to the ROI (brain) to segment intracranial aneurysms. The tool is working well, thank you very much ! I have a question, when I visualize the images in ITK-Snap before and after applying TS + cropping they look quite different wrt the intensity range, i.e I see less details/nuances of grey. Is it normal ? Thanks in advance for any insights ! |
Hi team, We used TotalSegmentator to create a novel dataset called SARAMIS (Simulation Assets for Robotic Assisted and Minimally Invasive Surgery): https://github.com/NMontanaBrown/saramis and https://openreview.net/forum?id=SEU9m9NReo¬eId=SEU9m9NReo. It was presented at NeurIPS 23 Datasets and Benchmarks Track. Thanks for making such a great tool! |
Probably the autowindowing results in differnet contrast. Try to set a fixed window which is the same for both images. |
We are working on adding those. But it will take some more time. |
Could you please add model weights for vertebrae class to do single part like vertebrae_C1 L1 T1 segementation? Thank you. |
I know vertebrae_body could provide a whole spine segementation, but it could not give the subparts of C1 L1 T1 etc. |
I use the following command, https://github.com/wasserth/TotalSegmentator#run-via-docker, using docker, to call the algorithm. Second, I do not find the model parameters file and config.json file on my local computer. If they are included in docker, how can I set "send_usage_stats" to False? |
Hello @wasserth , I am using TotalSegmentator for lung lobe segmentation and I'm working on publishing a comparative study evaluating available models for this task. LOLA11 dataset is often used as a benchmark to test and compare the performance of different lung lobe segmentation algorithms. I was wondering if I have permission to submit the TotalSegmentator results on the LOLA11 dataset, with clear acknowledgment that the algorithm is your work. If you are agreeable to this, please let me know if there are any specific conditions or preferences you would like me to follow when publishing the results. |
Hi all, Thank you so much for your hard work and for making your work so easy to deploy! I'm a graduate student in a group working on ultrasound to CT registration, and we use your program to help identify landmark structures in the CT volumes. One request: It appears that the base model does not have full coverage of the splenic and portal veins. I believe the team member responsible for this part of the project is merging their results from the full-body model and the liver vessels model, but would it be possible to create a version that is simply the organs and vessels in the stomach/liver region? |
It would be really helpful for us to now who is using TotalSegmentator and what they are using it for. Therefore, we invite you to comment on this issue: What are you using TotalSegmentator for? What classes are you using? Are there any classes you are missing (we can try to add them in future releases)? Who are you (only if you want to disclose this)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: