This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 18, 2025. It is now read-only.
Provide completion for cargo watch -x <TAB> #296
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
passcod
changed the title
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hereby I quickly added locally for me completion for
cargo watch -x <TAB>. I haven't yet wrapped my head around more complex callscargo watch -x "build --rele<TAB>and i so far blindly assume the_cargofile from rustup has been loaded by the completions system to provide _cargo_cmds. wdyt, is this worth having? (as is? differently?) also i noticed the repo looks different in the main branch but the 8.x branch looked more recent.