Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Search box component #1579

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Search box component #1579

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

esimkowitz
Copy link
Member

@esimkowitz esimkowitz commented Dec 19, 2024

Adding a new component for search dialogs. This will get hooked up to the Web widget, among other things.
image

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the search functionality within the frontend application. A new search.tsx component has been implemented, providing an interactive search interface that utilizes the jotai library for state management. This component supports features such as result navigation, dropdown positioning, and dynamic visibility control.

In conjunction with the new search component, a corresponding search.scss stylesheet has been created. This stylesheet defines a .search-container class with a flexbox layout and includes nested classes for the input field and search results, ensuring a structured and responsive design. Additional classes for button organization and styling have also been added.

A new Storybook configuration file (search.stories.tsx) has been introduced to illustrate various states of the search component, including a new story called LongInputAndResults10, which showcases a long search input. The previous searchinput.tsx and searchinput.stories.tsx files have been removed, indicating a refactor of the search input implementation.

Furthermore, the theme.scss file has been updated with new CSS custom properties for modal styling, specifically --modal-border-radius and --modal-box-shadow, enhancing the overall design system of the application.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (4)

28-37: useCallback dependency array
Your callback depends on setIsOpen, which is stable from jotai’s useAtom, so it should be safe. However, for clarity and future-proofing, consider including setIsOpen in the dependency array.


58-64: Edge case for previous button
When index is 0 and you press "Previous", no action is taken. Consider implementing wrap-around navigation or a visual cue if that’s desired.


66-72: Edge case for next button
Same logic applies: if you’d prefer wrap-around searching, implement it here. Otherwise, disabling the button is acceptable.


81-99: Accessibility considerations
For optimal accessibility, consider supporting keyboard navigation within the search interface (e.g., arrow keys for cycling through results, ESC key to close, etc.).

frontend/app/element/search.scss (2)

1-7: Maintain styling consistency
The container’s flex layout and background are clear. If your design system defines a standard border radius or padding, ensure consistency by referencing the new --modal-border-radius if desired.

.search-container {
-    border-radius: 15px;
+    border-radius: var(--modal-border-radius);
     box-shadow: var(--modal-box-shadow);
}

15-22: User input styling
Setting border: none can improve aesthetics, but keep in mind accessibility and focus states. Consider adding a visible focus outline for keyboard navigation.

frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (2)

19-26: Story initialization
Automatically opening search on mount is intuitive for demos. Consider a separate story variation that starts closed to showcase the initial hidden state.


44-53: Simulate many results
Setting 10 results is helpful for the demonstration. Add a dedicated story or a control to vary the number of results for interactive testing.

frontend/app/theme.scss (1)

86-86: Consider referencing new border radius
You’ve introduced --modal-border-radius. Check whether existing modals (beyond the search UI) can adopt these changes for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8235f34 and 493cd51.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • frontend/app/element/search.scss (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/element/searchinput.stories.tsx (0 hunks)
  • frontend/app/element/searchinput.tsx (0 hunks)
  • frontend/app/theme.scss (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • frontend/app/element/searchinput.stories.tsx
  • frontend/app/element/searchinput.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (3)

104-111: useSearch fallback
The fallback creation of anchorRef is a helpful pattern. Ensure that the rest of the code consistently references anchorRef from this hook instead of creating separate references.


9-17: ⚠️ Potential issue

Validate optional anchorRef parameter
Since anchorRef is optional, a runtime error may occur if anchorRef is not provided and anchorRef!.current is accessed. Consider adding a safety check or fallback to ensure references exist before usage.

- elements: {
-     reference: anchorRef!.current,
- },
+ elements: anchorRef?.current
+   ? {
+       reference: anchorRef.current,
+     }
+   : undefined,

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


74-79: Close behavior
The "Close" button sets isOpen to false. Make sure any upstream listeners or event callbacks are also cleaned up if the search was performing additional tasks.

frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (1)

71-81: Prepopulated search
Including a default “search term” is a nice demonstration. For real usage scenarios, ensure any sensitive or user-specific data is not stored by default.

frontend/app/theme.scss (1)

89-89: Incorporating new box shadow
The new --modal-box-shadow standardizes modal shadows. Ensure other modal-like elements consistently use it for a cohesive look.

frontend/app/element/search.scss Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (1)

19-98: Consider reducing code duplication across stories

The stories contain significant duplication in both the wrapper div and setup logic. Consider refactoring to:

  1. Extract the common wrapper div into a shared component
  2. Use Storybook decorators for common setup logic

Example refactor:

// Create a shared wrapper
const SearchWrapper: React.FC<{ children: React.ReactNode; anchorRef: React.RefObject<HTMLDivElement> }> = ({ children, anchorRef }) => (
  <div
    className="viewbox"
    ref={anchorRef}
    style={{
      border: "2px solid black",
      width: "100%",
      height: "200px",
      background: "var(--main-bg-color)",
    }}
  >
    {children}
  </div>
);

// Use in stories
export const DefaultSearch: Story = {
  decorators: [
    (Story, context) => {
      const props = useSearch();
      const setIsOpen = useSetAtom(props.isOpenAtom);
      useEffect(() => {
        setIsOpen(true);
      }, []);
      return (
        <SearchWrapper anchorRef={props.anchorRef as React.RefObject<HTMLDivElement>}>
          <Story {...context} {...props} />
        </SearchWrapper>
      );
    },
  ],
  render: (args) => <Search {...args} />,
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fce84ba and 8436854.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/app/element/search.stories.tsx (2)

1-9: LGTM! Well-structured imports and headers.

The file follows best practices with proper copyright headers and well-organized imports.


100-127: Verify the maximum input length handling

The LongInputAndResults10 story uses a repeated search term that might exceed the maximum allowed input length. Ensure that:

  1. The Search component properly handles long inputs
  2. The UI remains responsive with long search terms
✅ Verification successful

Input length is properly handled by the component

The Input component used in the Search component has built-in support for maxLength validation through an optional prop. The story's long input ("search term ".repeat(10)) would be approximately 110 characters, which is a reasonable length that:

  1. Will be properly handled by the native HTML input element's maxLength attribute if a limit is set
  2. Won't cause any performance issues in React's state management
  3. Is well within typical input field handling capabilities
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any input length validation in the Search component
ast-grep --pattern 'maxLength' frontend/app/element/search.tsx

# Look for any input validation or truncation logic
rg -A 5 'input.*length|truncate|maxLength' frontend/app/element/search.tsx

Length of output: 139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Search component implementation for any input handling
ast-grep --pattern 'input' frontend/app/element/search.tsx

# Look for any state management related to search input
rg -A 5 'searchAtom|setSearch' frontend/app/element/search.tsx

# Check if there's any input element with attributes
rg -A 5 '<input' frontend/app/element/search.tsx

Length of output: 1395


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Input component implementation since it's used in the Search component
ast-grep --pattern 'const Input' -l
rg -A 10 'const Input.*=' 

# Also check for any Input component file
fd -e tsx -e ts Input

Length of output: 6401


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Input component implementation for any maxLength or validation
cat frontend/app/element/input.tsx

# Also check if there are any input validation utilities
rg -A 5 'validate|sanitize|maxLength' frontend/app/element/input.tsx frontend/app/element/search.tsx

Length of output: 5745

};

export default meta;
type Story = StoryObj<typeof Popover>;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect Story type definition

The Story type is currently based on Popover when it should be based on Search since this is a stories file for the Search component.

-type Story = StoryObj<typeof Popover>;
+type Story = StoryObj<typeof Search>;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
type Story = StoryObj<typeof Popover>;
type Story = StoryObj<typeof Search>;

@esimkowitz esimkowitz merged commit 009bd39 into main Dec 19, 2024
10 checks passed
@esimkowitz esimkowitz deleted the evan/search-box branch December 19, 2024 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant