Trim whitespace from process names #283
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This causes detailed node lookups for the grouped-by-process-name view to fail. Also, add a test for process walker trimmming whitespace, and a test the process-by-name view gives the right result.
|
Paul's on holiday now. |
| "egress_bytes": 30, | ||
| "ingress_bytes": 300, | ||
| "egress_bytes": 10, | ||
| "ingress_bytes": 100, |
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as abuse.
This comment was marked as abuse.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Otherwise LGTM. |
tomwilkie
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2015
Trim whitespace from process names
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This causes detailed node lookups for the grouped-by-process-name view to fail. Also, add a test for process walker trimmming whitespace, and a test the process-by-name view gives the right result.
Works around #281, but I believe there is an underlying UI bug where URLs aren't escaped properly.