You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
This is a conscious choice, to make the script simpler, but is strictly unnecessary, and could lead to failure cases, e.g. if ipam is out of addresses.
[note that, as of current state of #827, the same will apply to detach with no preceding attach]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rade
changed the title
weave script will allocate a new address if you call hide with no preceding exposeweave hide allocates a new address if called with no preceding exposeJun 5, 2015
rade
changed the title
weave hide allocates a new address if called with no preceding exposeweave hide/detach allocates a new address if called with no preceding expose/attachOct 3, 2015
On a point of history, "could lead to failure cases, e.g. if ipam is out of addresses" was correct at the time of writing, but subsequently we decided that the behaviour of IPAM on out-of-addresses should be to wait until an address is available, which gives the behaviour you see.
This is a conscious choice, to make the script simpler, but is strictly unnecessary, and could lead to failure cases, e.g. if ipam is out of addresses.
[note that, as of current state of #827, the same will apply to
detach
with no precedingattach
]The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: