Add .dist.yml for image formats #878
Conversation
foolip
force-pushed
the
dist-image-formats
branch
from
dfbe85c
to
006ef9e
Compare
ddbeck
added
feature definition
| baseline: high | ||
| baseline_low_date: 2020-09-16 | ||
| support: | ||
| chrome: "9" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caniuse says this is partial through Chrome 22 (for transparent and lossless images) or 31 (for animated). Was it intended to take the earlier versions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It was intentional yes, and I did the same for AVIF where the Safari version would otherwise change.
I think matching caniuse and treating animations as an essential part of support would be OK too, but my hunch is that still images are the overwhelming use case, and that support for animations would make more sense as notes that don't imply partial implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we could expand on the comments then? Something like…
# TODO: Add notes about animated <format> coming later in Chrome (but don't mark this as partially supported)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure thing, I've updates the notes using that template.
WebP data is from https://caniuse.com/webp. Notes for animated AVIF and WebP are left as TODOs.
foolip
force-pushed
the
dist-image-formats
branch
from
ac9543e
to
920e221
Compare
WebP data is from https://caniuse.com/webp. Like for AVIF, partial
support was not captured and left as a TODO.