Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[@layer] Cascade VTT-embedded style as element-attached style #31591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2021

Conversation

chromium-wpt-export-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@chromium-wpt-export-bot chromium-wpt-export-bot commented Nov 11, 2021

As per w3c/csswg-drafts#6735:

WebVTT-embedded style has the same cascade precedence as the style
attribute. Therefore, important WebVTT-embedded style should take
precedence over important author layered style.

This patch ensures that.

Bug: 1095765
Change-Id: I352ff87294235433bcf006e233a2ca7514d4f990
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3273710
Reviewed-by: Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andruud@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Xiaocheng Hu <xiaochengh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#940808}

Copy link
Collaborator

@wpt-pr-bot wpt-pr-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The review process for this patch is being conducted in the Chromium project.

As per w3c/csswg-drafts#6735:

WebVTT-embedded style has the same cascade precedence as the style
attribute. Therefore, important WebVTT-embedded style should take
precedence over important author layered style.

This patch ensures that.

Bug: 1095765
Change-Id: I352ff87294235433bcf006e233a2ca7514d4f990
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/3273710
Reviewed-by: Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andruud@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Xiaocheng Hu <xiaochengh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#940808}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants