Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct worker test for unsupported: scheme #41758

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

annevk
Copy link
Member

@annevk annevk commented Sep 1, 2023

Identified in #41745.

@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Sep 1, 2023

Any other tests that are broken?

@annevk
Copy link
Member Author

annevk commented Sep 1, 2023

I guess I should add a test for a URL that does fail to parse so we have something that fails synchronously.

annevk added a commit to whatwg/html that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2023
In particular, if you can execute script, you can execute a worker. Making workers an optional feature is not actually something user agents implement and has led to implementer confusion, e.g., web-platform-tests/wpt#41758.
annevk added a commit to whatwg/html that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
In particular, if you can execute script, you can execute a worker. Making workers an optional feature is not actually something user agents implement and has led to implementer confusion, e.g., web-platform-tests/wpt#41758.
Copy link
Contributor

@noamr noamr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. If you want to wait for one of the assigned reviewers be my guest!

@annevk annevk merged commit 2d504ed into master Sep 5, 2023
@annevk annevk deleted the annevk/worker-unsupported branch September 5, 2023 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants