Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation review #41

Open
thargy opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Documentation review #41

thargy opened this issue Mar 30, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@josh-green
Labels
cosmetic A cosmetic bug doesn't cause broken functionality
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@thargy
Copy link
Contributor

thargy commented Mar 30, 2017

Further to Issue #37, following completion of a transfer to DocFX, we should perform a thorough review of documentation to enhance it and add more details, explanations, and samples. We should also review and clean up any styling issues, e.g. around the index/contents, etc.
thargy added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 30, 2017
@thargy
Merge pull request #40 from josh-green/master
45a3300 
Migrating documentation to DocFx.  This is an initial transformation of existing documentation, and will be the basis of further cleanup work (see Issue #41).
@thargy thargy mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2017
Closed
@thargy thargy added this to the Backlog milestone Apr 5, 2017
@thargy thargy added the cosmetic A cosmetic bug doesn't cause broken functionality label Jun 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@josh-green josh-green

Labels
cosmetic A cosmetic bug doesn't cause broken functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thargy @josh-green