feat(newdocs): added sept 21 docs #14
Conversation
rambling sentence
|
|
||
| * Link to [releases page](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases) | ||
|
|
||
| * Should clarify `concepts` vs `api` vs `configuration` sections what they mean, etc. |
|
|
||
| * Should clarify `concepts` vs `api` vs `configuration` sections what they mean, etc. | ||
|
|
||
| * At 45% completion now. Will still want to post a publication (when we have time that has a clear call to action explaining exactly what remains for webpack 2 docs to be satisfied). |
|
|
||
| #### Documentation Updates | ||
|
|
||
| * Juho is going to start working on [antwar/antwar#103](https://github.com/antwarjs/antwar/issues/103) next week. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Long shot, but have you guys seen spike? Also a static generator built on top of webpack. We're working on a plugin for jekyll-style dynamic collections with metadata right now as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you want to port to spike, I definitely welcome a PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll bet that @KyleAMathews would be happy to give back to Webpack by submitting a PR to do this with gatsby, or @MoOx would be happy to do so with phenomic. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok. As long as you meet the project requirements and are willing to maintain it, PRs welcome. 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with @bebraw. It would involve requiring maintaining in addition to meeting any extra features the current site provides etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll volunteer — I'm in documentation site building mode right now anyways as I have 4 or 5 documentation sites I'm going to be putting together already in the next week or two. Would be easy to slip in another :-) I could have a PR w/ Gatsby ready by the end of the week.
My plan with Gatsby 1.0 and its theme/plugin support is to build a very robust "open source documentation site" theme with all the niceties that you could want. The nice thing about this is we'd be sharing the maintenance load for the Webpack site with a number of others.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
e.g. I'd be using the same underpinnings for the Webpack site for the Gatsby site, Typography.js. Also helping out with KeystoneJS' new site so work would be shared with them as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok. I guess we'll wait a PR from Spike, Gatsby, and Phenomic then and do decisions after that. I'll code the missing bit for Antwar regardless, but obviously the community decides.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can also give a hand, Phenomic just got support for webpack 2 (so we support both 1) and is now using hard-source-webpack-plugin - which is awesome btw!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Happy to send a spike port PR, its the least we could do for all that webpack has given us. Will have something ready probably in a couple weeks! 😁
Sorry this is a bit late catching up with sickness and conferences etc. This should be the most recent notes.
@webpack/collab-team
@webpack/contributor-team
Extra pair of eyes welcome for typos, questions, points of clarification.